• Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now
  • Join GIFT's Global Leaders Programme | Sign Up Now
  • Beyond the Binary Lens: Implications of US–China Rivalry for Policy and Business | Register Now

| Talent Development

How recent graduates entering the job market can outperform AI

AI is not just replacing jobs. It is quietly eroding the cognitive and interpersonal skills young professionals need to stay valuable in an automated future.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is eroding the very capabilities young professionals need to remain valuable in a machine-automated era. That is the real challenge facing graduates entering the workforce. It is not simply a case of AI destroying jobs – though it is – but that it is undermining our cognitive and interpersonal skills.

The numbers are starting to confirm what we suspected. Hong Kong graduates in 2025 found 55 per cent fewer job opportunities than the year before. Over 12 per cent of those aged 20 to 24 were unemployed in December, the second-highest figure on record.
 
Given a roughly 40-fold reduction in the cost of synthetic cognition (AI) per unit of output, a 2023 prediction that 25 per cent of the city’s workforce would need to change careers by 2028 now looks conservative. Many of Hong Kong’s thousands of legal jobs are threatened by products like Anthropic’s recent plug-in for legal work. Other local applications are bound to come.

Time is short, and a generation of unemployed graduates is waiting. The government must act to derail a train bound to crash into aspiring young graduates.

One way to start is to urgently rethink and retool existing subsidy frameworks. Hong Kong’s Research Talent Hub provides salary allowances for R&D roles.

Rather than allowing firms to merely offset the cost of low-level technical headcount, the subsidy should be conditional on evidence of “cognitive apprenticeships”, encouraging a shift away from a focus on cheap labour towards a deliberate investment in building capability.

Bolder still, regulators should introduce cognitive capability standards in professional licensing and accreditation. If you want to practise law or accounting, you must show you can reason through a complex problem without an algorithm. This would create artificial market demand for human skills at risk of atrophy.

Employers must redesign junior roles. Just as pilots must learn to fly manually before relying on autopilot, companies can structure early-career positions so that AI helps rather than generates, reducing the extra work to parse “AI slop”. New hires can be required to reason through problems and use AI only to check their work, not replace their thinking.

After over 20 years of experiential learning across Asia, our team at The Global Institute for Tomorrow understands productive struggle. Working on real problems in unfamiliar contexts builds judgment, resilience and problem-solving skills that are immune to chatbot competition. Companies may in the end decide to bond junior employees with a contract under which professional development is provided in return for a promise to remain for a minimum period of time.

The education system needs urgent reform. Long-form reading of printed books, a practice in danger of being abandoned, strengthens empathy, systems thinking and imagination in ways screen-based consumption cannot. Universities must rethink assessments. Testing for reasoning rather than polished output would reward the cognitive capabilities the labour market demands. 
 
It is beyond the scope of young professionals to reshape the job market. But like every generation, they must adapt, even if this time is more structural. The choice is between automation’s comfort and deliberate friction, which builds capability. Those who consciously choose “productive struggle” will be the ones employers hire. They will need support to make that choice. But they must make it.

Eric Stryson is Managing Director of the Global Institute For Tomorrow (GIFT) in Hong Kong. He possesses expertise in governance, business model innovation, leadership transformation, talent development, and sustainability. He coaches leaders from business, government, and civil society to critically examine their roles, look beyond conventional wisdom, deepen their understanding of global issues, and take ownership of their impact on their organisations and society at large.

More insights and resources you might find useful

It seems we can’t find what you’re looking for.

Sign up for clarity in a world of complexity

Subscribe to receive our insights and resources on leadership, organisational development, and the global and regional trends reshaping business and society.